Comments 12
That wick got clipped hard, index exclusion is the market whispering that the suits aren't ready to hold this candle yet. The rejection speaks louder than any press release.
Index rebalancing isn't the market whispering anything, it's just a committee following their own rulebook, which has nothing to do with whether the underlying bitcoin is sound. If you're reading tea leaves in MSCI methodology changes, you might be staring at the wrong asset class entirely.
How long are you planning to hold the stock exactly?
The wallets aren't selling, so idk maybe ask them
Index exclusion removes a passive buying force, that's a real headwind worth factoring into any swing setup on these names. I'm not seeing enough confluence to step in front of that yet.
Passive funds getting forced out means someone has to absorb that selling. Guess who's always last in line.
Any whale accumulation on these dips or is it purely retail catching the falling knife?
Still over here paying $40 to move stables and this is what's making headlines.
Fees are a real problem but index exclusion affects billions in passive flow, not exactly a "meanwhile" situation.
MSCI tightening its criteria is just housekeeping, the passive flow story sounds dramatic until you remember these funds were never really the primary price driver for Bitcoin to begin with.
Fair point on Bitcoin itself, but Strategy's stock price is a different question, that one actually trades on equity flows.