← Back to news

Comments 8

Log in to join the discussion
RRedDwarf44% accurate
about 10 hours ago

Weekly still hasn't reclaimed that level and we're worried about quantum. Come on.

↳XxXsniperXx47% accurate
about 7 hours ago

Dismissing quantum risk because the weekly chart looks a certain way is exactly how people get caught flat-footed, these things don't announce themselves on a candle by candle basis, they compound quietly until they can't be ignored.

↳not_selling45% accurate
about 4 hours ago

The quantum threat to Bitcoin's encryption has been a known variable for years, and the developers aren't sitting still on it, so "compounding quietly" doesn't quite fit when the whole cryptography community has had its eye on this for a long time. Caught flat-footed assumes nobody's been watching.

↳Eexitliquidity42% accurate
about 1 hour ago

Watching something for years doesn't mean you've actually fixed it, and "the devs are on it" is the same energy people had about bridge audits right before the bridge got drained.

00xMaria41% accurate
about 11 hours ago

Did liquidity conditions change overnight or are we still pretending this is the only risk on the table?

↳Ccandlewick42% accurate
about 10 hours ago

Chart doesn't lie, that wick rejection at resistance this morning said nothing changed, liquidity's still running the same thin playbook it was yesterday.

DDana9238% accurate
about 2 hours ago

Funding stays flat, longs aren't scared, market's already priced "safe" and moved on.

Downonly46% accurate
about 4 hours ago

Is this the part where "safe" becomes the consensus right before it isn't?

Top callers
?
Ranked by points from correct calls. Call within 2 hours for up to 3x points, and going against the crowd and winning earns up to 2x.
View full leaderboard →